Evernote ocr pdf how long

For example, I dug around and found an old note in my account containing only a single photo of a bottle of beer:. Contained within recoIndex are a number of item nodes. Each item contains four attributes: x and y indicating the coordinates of top-left corner of the area represented by the item , as well as w and h representing the width and height of the item.

As an image is evaluated for textual content, a set of possible matches is created as child elements to their corresponding item. Each match is assigned a weight represented by the w attribute of the item : a numeric value indicating the likelihood that the given match text is the same as the text in the image. At this point, the text found in the image is available for search. When a user issues a search within an Evernote client, the content of the t elements is searched:.

This second PDF is not visible to the user and exists only to facilitate search. In practical terms, this eliminates many PDFs generated by other applications from text-based formats, such as word processors and other authoring applications. However Evernote indicates it will be able to make notes searchable, it is the main reason I bought in.

It now looks like it can, sometimes. But more to the point when it cannot it does not let you know or am I missing a flag somewhere. It would be useful if Evernote had the facility to flag notes that it could not OCR to allow you to go back and OCR only those ones manually.

Didn't the previous poster say that the pdf given as an example was a pic inside a pdf container? Yes, it is sort of an image, but is is not a plain bitmap. So not only EN can not handle this, but other programs build to and able to modify most PDFs will not work as well. If the local OCR is crappy, but done to a pdf, EN will not do it again, even when the results would be much better. Thanks for the teplyDidn't the previous poster say that the pdf given as an example was a pic inside a pdf container?

Typically I learn of an issue when I am looking for something and can't find it, but I know it is in EN. Again, typically it is a renderable text issue for me.

Some statements, bills, advices, etc. It is just too much of a problem to try and fix later when it may or may not have worked and you have no way of knowing which it was. I have several thousand pdf attachments in my EN account, from all sort of sources, and everything is working as needed full search, highlighting of hits etc.

But if I throw non-conforming stuff at an algorithm, the program will go, check and deliver a non-result. That is my gripe, you can enter in notes but not know straight away that they will not OCR via EN and if they don't you have no way of knowing You might be able to shrink the universe.

For me It only happens with a subset of downloaded PDFs. I know the offending providers at this point. PITA I have to remember to check new ones. The offending PDF's have been sent to me in a bundle being used in a legal case. To make things interesting not all of them are a problem. Just a thought: Knowing that legal counsel especially the big law firms extensively use data processing and data mining in legal issues, could it be that these PDFs were intentionally set up in a way to make OCRing them difficult?

I would not know how to do this, but it might make sense:. You hand over a volume of data to the opponent, putting the critical part into PDFs that will most likely not be OCRed.

The other side will put everything into their machine, crunch it through and start working on it. Now, the interesting part is not found, because it is there, but not processed, and hidden among all the rest. If your OCR normally works fine, and you do not except this, you will rely on search and similar functions, and will simply overlook what is there.

Who created these PDFs will not have violated discovery terms, because the information was delivered. Just too bad when the opponent did not find it. I think it's more a issue of Evernote's decision not to OCR the pdf.

You'll have to make the same decision. I do not have the original Adobe suite, but pretty good stuff that usually can open, edit and OCR every pdf I throw on it. As I understand it, any file uploaded will enter a queue.

If it contains significant text information, it will not again be OCRed. If not, the server will try to OCR it. If this worked, the information will be added to make it searchable. But as you say, running Microsoft is like being on a submarine: The problems start immediately when you open the first window Should I point out that the documentation was not only un OCRable but that it included all documents pertaining to an individual that had worked for as a teacher for the past 15 years.

The documents, memos, notes, emails etc etc etc were wrapped up in one BIG pdf and each one was in there randomly by date and type. I meant more along the lines did the originator apply some form of protection to the PDF contents. I don't want to do that as the files may be used in evidence so I do not want to materially alter them or rely on a file derived from them that coukd be questioned etc etc.

There has to be just a flag on the file that prevents that, I would be surprised if there was not a pdf reader out there that ignored it though I have been known yo be wrong. When trying to open the pdf, resp. Work on it, I did not have the impression that it was PW-protected. I think the issue preventing the OCR was the type or properties of the picture that made up for most of the file content.

It seems the OCR used non monospace, which introduced a series of imaginary spaces between the letters. In fact when identified as monospace it should be quite easy to OCR, because letters never overlap. When EN does it on the server, the OCR result is stored in a hidden section somewhere in the note, not in the pdf itself. At least I have never noticed a pdf changed by EN, so probably this is true. When I have time and my different clients up and running, I think I will repeat my tests on search results.

Last time after rebuilding the index I came out with no significant difference. It's like doing the OCR within the desktop app sends the OCR results to the server whereas the initial note create does not.

Was this happening close to the initial upload? Then maybe the OCR on the server had not yet taken place. My impression is EN is doing it pretty fast, but depending on workload there may be a lag until the OCR data is available.

This is problematic in that Office docs are supposed to be included in searches, a second issue in any case. You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy! Already have an account? Sign in here. Separate OCR workflow? Followers 3. Recommended Posts. Titus 9 Posted November 17, Posted November 17, You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Sign up for a new account in our community.

It's easy! Already have an account? Sign in here. Followers 3. Recommended Posts. TumblingYak 3 Posted January 20, Posted January 20, How long does this take, on average? I added a scanned typed document about 30 hours ago, and still nothing. I do understand that as a non-Premium member I'm in a queue Link to comment.

CalS 4, Posted January 20, Thanks for the responses. I'm on a Mac, so those Windows options aren't available for me. I tried searching on the Web client as recommended - nothing there either. You are welcome. TumblingYak 3 Posted January 21, Posted January 21, TumblingYak 3 Posted January 22, Posted January 22, Now 4 days.

TumblingYak 3 Posted January 23, Posted January 23,